Denosumab

Compound Name:DenosumabMolecular Target:RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand)Molecular Structure:Human IgG2 monoclonal antibodyLicensed Indication:Xgeva: Prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors; Prolia: treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis; treatment of men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer; treatment of womManufacturer and/or Distributor:AmgenInitial FDA Approval2010SummaryDenosumab is a humanized recombinant IgG2 monoclonal antibody which is sold under two brand names, Prolia® or Xgeva®. Prolia® is approved for treating patients at high risk for fracture receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for non-metastatic prostate cancer or adjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy for breast cancer to increase bone mass; and Xgeva®, for use in bone metastatic solid cancer to prevent further skeletal-related events. Mechanistically, Denosumab binds receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) with high affinity and specificity which in turn interfering with its ability to bind to its receptor, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK). RANK (or CD265), a type I membrane protein and a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, is found on pre-osteoclasts. RANKL (or CD254), tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 11 (TNFSF11), TNF-related activation-induced cytokine (TRANCE), osteoprotegerin ligand (OPGL), and osteoclast differentiation factor (ODF), is expressed on the surface of some T cells and on stromal cells. As bone homeostasis is a constant and continuous cellular balance between old bone break down or removal by osteoclasts, the resorbing cells and new bone synthesis by osteoblasts. In fact, denosumab works by blocking the ability of RANKL to bind to RANK, thereby interfering with activation of this pre-osteoclast and osteoclast cell surface receptor (Figure 1). The absence of RANKL-RANK signaling suppresses maturation of RANK-bearing pre-osteoclasts into osteoclasts and thus preventing from activating osteoclasts in bone resorption/destruction (Castellano, D., et al., 2011). Therefore, the net effect of denosumab interference with osteoclast activation is suppression of bone breakdown, with a shift in the balance toward net bone build-up. In this way denosumab mimics the natural factor, osteoprotegerin, which binds to and therefore counterbalances RANKL effect. Thus, Denosumab inhibits the formation, function, and survival of activated osteoclasts, bone destruction, and localized tumor growth. Currently, Denosumab has shown to be more effective in delaying or preventing skeletal morbidity in patients with bone metastases from several types of cancers (Gravalos, C., et al., 2016). Denosumab is contraindicated for patients with hypocalcaemia. Both calcium and vitamin D repletion therapy should be completed before denosumab therapy is initiated. There are no data concerning interactions with other drugs. Given its mechanism of action it seems unlikely that denosumab will have clinically relevant interactions with small molecules, either immunomodulatory or otherwise. Since RANKL and RANK are expressed on T cells and dendritic cells, respectively, it is possible that denosumab may have immunomodulatory effects. Denosumab has been developed in two distinct dosing regimens with separate approvals and brand names: 1.) As PROLIA® (60 mg given subcutaneously every 6 months), denosumab was approved in 2010 for treatment to increase bone mass in (1) men or postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture, in which PROLIA® reduces the incidence of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures; (2) men at risk for fracture receiving androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer, in which PROLIA® significantly reduces the incidence of vertebral fractures at 36 months; and (3) women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer. Recent studies have shown that PROLIA® not only successfully treat bony metastases and prevent treatment-induced bone loss, it also reduces recurrence and improves survival of postmenopausal breast cancer patients (Gnant, M., Pfeiler, G. & Dubsky, P.C, et al., 2015). Adverse reactions to denosumab in the PROLIA® formulation include: hypocalcemia (especially in patients with severe renal impairment or receiving dialysis), arthralgia, back pain, pain in extremity, osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fractures, severe skin rashes and infections, musculoskeletal pain, and hypercholesterolemia. The most common adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of PROLIA® are back pain and constipation. Hypocalcemia, pregnancy, and known hypersensitivity are contraindications. PROLIA® is pregnancy category X-Not for use in pregnancy. 2.) As XGEVA® (120 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks) denosumab was approved in 2010 for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors and giant cell tumors of the bone. Adverse reactions to denosumab in the XGEVA® formulation include: hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fractures, embryo-fetal toxicity and hypersensitivity. XGEVA® is pregnancy category D. References

Package Inserts:

Prolia: http://pi.amgen.com/united_states/prolia/prolia_pi.pdf       
Xgeva: http://pi.amgen.com/united_states/xgeva/xgeva_pi.pdf



1. Castellano, D., Sepulveda, J.M., Garcia-Escobar, I., Rodriguez-Antolin, A., Sundiov, A. and Cortes-Funes, H. The role of RANK-ligand inhibition in cancer: the story of denosumab.  Oncologist, 2011. 16(2): 136-45. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228090/

2. Saylor, P.J. Lee, R.J. and Smith, M.R. Emerging therapies to prevent skeletal morbidity in men with prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol, 2011. 29(27): 3705-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675709/

3. Gnant M, Pfeiler G, Dubsky PC, et al. Adjuvant denosumab in breast cancer (ABCSG-18): a multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(9992):433-443. http://www.onclive.com/conference-coverage/sabcs-2015/denosumab-demonstrates-survival-benefit-in-postmenopausal-women#sthash.TKBb7NDF.dpuf

4. Hakozaki, M. et al.  Radiological and pathological characteristics of giant cell tumor of bone treated with denosumab.  Diagnostic Pathology. 2014, 9:11 http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/9/1/111

5. Dore RK. The RANKL pathway and denosumab. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2011 Aug; 37(3):433-452, vi-vii.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=22023901

6. Fizazi K, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. Lancet. 2011 Mar 5; 377(9768):813-822.
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=21353695

7. Cummings SR, et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20; 361(8):756-765.
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19671655

8. Khosla S. Increasing options for the treatment of osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20; 361(8):818-820.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19671654

9. Lipton A, et al. Randomized active-controlled phase II study of denosumab efficacy and safety in patients with breast cancer-related bone metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 1; 25(28):4431-4437.
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17785705

10. Papapoulos S, et al. Five years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the first two years of the FREEDOM extension. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Mar; 27(3):694-701
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=22113951

11. Reid IR and Cornish J. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of osteonecrosis of the jaw. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 Feb; 8(2):90-96.
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=22124271

12. Rizzoli R and Reginster JY. Adverse drug reactions to osteoporosis treatments. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Sep; 4(5):593-604.
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=22220306

13. Stopeck AT, et al. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10; 28(35):5132-5139.
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=21060033

14. Brown JE and Coleman RE. Denosumab in patients with cancer-a surgical strike against the osteoclast. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb; 9(2):110-118.
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=22231759

15. Yee A and Raje N. Denosumab, a RANK ligand inhibitor, for the management of bone loss in cancer patients. Clinical interventions in aging. 2012; 7:331-338.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S14566

16. Diab DL and Watts NB. Denosumab in osteoporosis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Feb; 13(2):247-53. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2014.860133. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289327

17. Gravalos C, et al. SEOM clinical guideline for bone metastases from solid tumours (2016). Clin Transl Oncol (17 November 2016) 18:1243 – 1253. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896639

top